The poetry workshop ended on a good note for me — including going out afterward for a burger and beer with a couple of the other poets.
My revision of Still Life With Lunch got a great reception. All the scaffolding is gone. In all honesty, I do believe that it’s a better poem. I had to take out stuff I liked, but the stuff I liked wasn’t adding to the power of the piece. So, what I learned from Grennon is that it’s worth it to keep revising and revising — IF what you want is an artistically crafted and meaningful poem. I’m still learning.
Meanwhile, my Road Runner connection keeps coming and going, so I have no idea how much I’ll be able to post.
There are some poems written by some of the other poets in the workshop that I’d like to post here. I’m going to email them next week and get their permission. Maybe they’ll let me post their “before” and “after” as well.
There were some changes suggested for my final Vermeer’s Lady poem (as well as a comment by Grennon that I was being “weird” and “shades of Sylvia Plath”. I think he was just trying to be funny, since my poem was the only one that was, indeed, a little weird.) I’ll post the final version when I make the minor changes.
As a final learning experience, Grennon shared copies of the umpteen pages of revisions that finally resulted in this poem by Elizabeth Bishop. Her papers are in the archives of Vassar College.
Now I’ve got to clean up around my computer, so that when the Road Runner guy comes over tomorrow to figure out what’s going on, I won’t have anything incriminating hanging around. 🙂
Monthly Archives: April 2004
How do you know when a poem is finished?
I keep tinkering. But at some point you have to cut it loose. This is what I’m taking to the poetry workshop tonight (changes, while small, I think are signficant):
Vermeer’s Lady Writing a Letter
she’s taken a knife to her hair, again,
sliced away those willing strands
that each day hold her captive
in the clasp of perfect pearls
she studies herself in the mirror,
in the mellow light of morning —
a golden woman besieged by shadows
chained to a string of perfect pearls
at night she dreams of rubies
crystalline and star-filled
burning shadows bloody,
crushing seas of pearls
to evanescent dust
and so she closes her door
against the burdens of moment
turns to quill and paper —
a mirror freed by sunlight
and rich ruby dreams
Why I keep going to Boston.
And, finally, a poem is born.
If you’ve been following my labor pains as I make the effort to complete the assignments for an advanced poetry workshop at the New York State Writer’s Institute, you know that
–the first assignment was to write three different possible first stanzas (of 11 lines each, each line between 9 and 13 syllables) based on this Vermeer painting. At the first session, the group came to consensus about which of each of our three stanzas was the one we should each go with.
–the second assignment was to sharpen that selected first stanza and write three second stanzas (I only could get out one). The same consensus process followed — except for mine, of course since I gave them no choice.
–the third assignment was to write three possible versions of a third stanza. I missed that workshop session for lots of reasons, including that I didn’t have the time or energy to come up with even one possible third stanza.
If you didn’t know all of that before, you know it now.
Our last workshop session is tomorrow. The assignment for that was to arrive with and share, in whatever form and fomat we finally freed ourselves to choose, our poem about the painting.
Here’s mine. Much better, doncha’ think? Well, too bad if you don’t because I do.
Vermeer
Close but no cigar.
It’s almost 1 a.m. I am putting Vermeer to rest for the night. This is what I have at the moment.
Vermeer
Change is the only constant.
Even here on Kalilily Time, things are changing. Slowly, though, as I wait for b!X to find out why he’s been erased as administrator of this weblog and reverse whatever happened so that he can make the template changes that I want.
Meanwhile, over at the sidebar there’s a whole new section of links to poets who have weblogs and post their poetry therein. I’ve just started searching for these kinds of links and I’ll add them as I find ones that I like. Thanks to Greg Perry for getting me going in this direction.
Also, thanks to Ramona Moormann, a non-blogging reader who’s in my age and interest range. She’s having some trouble getting onto my weblog and emailed me about that and about the fact that she does stop in and visit here. She’s the editor/publisher of a small family-run newspaper in southwestern Michigan and is a political and environmental activist. She’s a truly interesting woman, and I’m glad she found and contacted me.
On the other hand, I’ve seem to have lost a blogpoet to whom I was going to link in my new sidebard section. Ray Sweatman seems to have “gone fishing — indefinitely.”
Meanwhile, I’ve got to stop procrastinating and take another stab at the Vermeer painting poem so that I have something to take with me to the last poetry workshop session this Thursday. It’s going to be a long night.
WWDD
That means “What Would Dad Do?” That’s my dad, I mean. He’s been dead just about 20 years, and he was far from a perfect dad. But he never failed to be there when I needed his money or his time. He would leave someone else in charge of his business, pack up my mother and the car, and make the three-hour drive up to my house on the hill if I needed them to stay with my kids when I had to travel for my job. He bought me more than one car over the years, gave us money toward the house we bought, and substantially contributed toward my kids’ college costs. When my daughter got really sick at college, he dropped everything, drove out and bundled her into his car (he was closer than I), and even got a doctor to come to his house to see her.
And that’s why I drive across the whole state of Massachusetts to pick up my daughter and family (who don’t have a car) and then drive half way back again to help them look at houses for sale (where they hope to live, soon) and then drive back across that half I just drove them out across to take them back home. Of course, I do stay over a few nights, play with my sweet, sweet, toddler grandson, and read the books I never get around to reading at home. (This time it’s “Sweet Dream Baby.”) And that’s why I send more money to help out b!X than I really can afford.
I think that I inherited most of my personality traits from my dad — even the traits that laid dormant in him because no one ever enouraged them, like his creative urges. I remember that he tried “paint-by-number” paintings once, and he bought some reproductions that he thought were valuable art from places like the Franklin Mint and such, for which he paid exorbitant prices for stuff like Norman Rockwell plates and a replica of the Liberty Bell (including plexiglass case) and an odd concave enamel-on-copper supposedly three-dimensional winter scene. He thought they were an investment and would be worth more someday. In many of the ways of the world he was amazingly smart; he just didn’t know squat about art.
But he was smart enough and loving enough to try to be a good father in the only ways that he knew how. His own father, who is reputed to have beat him (and who was finally relegated by my grandmother to a room of his own on another floor of the apartment building that they owned), was hardly a role model.
For all of his flaws, though, my dad always extended himself to help me when I needed his help — even though I broke his heart by eloping and depriving him of his dream of walking me down the aisle of the cathedral-like Polish church where he spent so much of his energy volunteering, even though my teenage years were dedicated to flouting his authority, even though I turned my back on the religion that sustained him through all those difficult times, even though I divorced and lived a free-wheeling lifestyle that he couldn’t understand.
And so, driving back from Boston today in the rain — back to the demands of the care of an ailing 88 year-old woman (who is my mother and many of whose traits I have tried very hard not to emulate) — I think of what my dad did, what he still would do, what I choose to do.
For many of us, life is more important than art, family more important than frolic. But then, again, over the years, I have had more than my share of frolic, and I have been on the receiving end of much generosity.
Driving back from Boston today in the rain, I think about what my dad would think of me now, this tired, grubby granny who is still trying to grow up, who would really like, one day, to become one of those unerringly compassionate matriarchs, one of those serene and classy crones.
I don’t give a should.
I should be getting ready to go to the poetry workshop at the Writers Institute.
I should be outside taking a walk in this great weather.
I should be making dinner and packing to go to see my toddler grandson.
Instead, I just watched The Banger Sisters and loved every minute of it.
Instead I polished my toenails because it’s warm enough to wear sandals and I’ve still got great toes.
Instead I left a comment on Tom Shugart’s weblog about a subject that apparently started at Yule Heibel’s weblog and about which I care a great deal.
Instead I post this.
But I promise that when I get back from Boston, I will have my poetry assignment done. And after I get back, I’ll make sure I get Greg Perry into my weblog, along with some other weblogcleaning I need to do.
OK. Now I really do have to make dinner for my mom. And pack. Maybe shave my legs.
Tally Ho!
And now for a little Bush-bashing.
Oh man, you gotta go to this site and see Trump fire Bush.
Got this in an email: Bush as Post Turtle. Love it.
While suturing a laceration on the hand of a 70-year-old Texas rancher (whose hand had caught in a gate while working cattle), a doctor and the old man were talking about George W. Bush being in the White House. The old Texan said “Well, ya know, Bush is a ‘post turtle’.”
Not knowing what the old man meant, the doctor asked him what a post turtle was. The old man said, “When you’re driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that’s a post turtle.”
The old man saw a puzzled look on the doctor’s face, so he continued to explain, “You know he didn’t get there by himself, he doesn’t belong there, he can’t get anything done while he’s up there, and you just want to help the poor stupid bastard get down.”
Sweeter than wine..
How sweet it is when a stranger finds your weblog and then emails you a compliment. Such was the case today when Greg Perry, who has a cleverly wine-designed weblog, told me that he’s been following my struggles to write poetry-on-assignment. He offered to link to me and asked me to link to him. Well, that’s a no-brainer! I’m also going to co-opt some of his poetry links and add them to my blogroll. (Except not tonight. I’m pooped.)
This connection from Greg has come at a perfect time for Kalilily Time, as I struggle with the fact that the blogcrowd around whose edges I’ve been running since I first began has gone off and left me behind. Or rather I’ve gone off in another direction. As a matter of fact, I’ve felt a little lost lately.
I’m not interested in the ins and outs of this technology. I’m a writer. I want to write about two things — caregiving and poetry. Well, sometimes about my grandson, too. And politics. Certainly politics. Politics and poetry. And loss.
As my mother loses herself in Yonkers, she finds this 1959 photo of me motor-boating up the Hudson River during the one summer I did go home between college semesters. Ah, was I ever that young? That slim? Yes. That “me” is long lost.
I never imagined, back then, when the Hudson River just outside New York City was clean enough to water ski in and life was just one big sunny-day boat ride, that I would wind up here.
So, I take a cue from Greg Perry’s post about the meme that’s going around and
1. Grab the nearest book.
2. Open the book to page 23.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the text of the sentence in your journal along with these instructions.
And this is what I find in John Horgan’s Rational Mysticism:
“But the infinite can exclude nothing.”
Hmpf.