smoke gets in my eyes
and nose and sinuses…

I’m one of those people who never smoked. Oh, I tried it in my teens, my cousin and I swiping Parliaments out of the case in her father’s soda fountain where we both worked on weekends. We would lock ourselves in the bathroom and blow smoke out the high little window. In college, I tried again, since most of my sorority sisters smoked. But I still didn’t like it, and I’d rather spend my money on beer anyway. (Back then, a big glass of beer was 10 cents; of course, the beer company was owned by the city’s Democratic machine bosses and so every bar had to carry it. The beer did not exactly taste that great but it did the trick.)
Back to smoking. Maybe it’s that I hate being addicted to anything or anyone. Not even hanging on to things I own. Well, maybe my computer.
My son is a smoker. I hate that and he knows it. I hate it because of what it’s doing to his lungs, his brain. I hate it because his father used to smoke and he’s feeling the effects of it to this day. But my son is an adult with the right to do with his own life and his health as he chooses.
Over on my his weblog, he is assessing the appropriateness of efforts of a Commissioner of the city of Portland, Oregon to institute a public policy that bans public smoking, even on sidewalks.
I left the statement below as a comment on one of his posts.

It seems to me that the public policy debate is very much related to how that public policy affects the health of individuals of that public. Granted, gas fumes are also unhealthy. But that’s another public policy debate issue.

Cigarette smoke is both noxiously harmful and noxiously distasteful to smell. Smokers do get used it it. You can get used to living next to the smell of a garbage dump.

Many health establishments ban people from wearing strong perfumes. The sense of smell is very sensitive in most people, especially non-smokers. Personally, cigarette smoke makes me nauseous and makes my sinuses swell. So does strong perfume. But at least strong perfume is not toxic to lungs. And it doesn’t do damage to brain cells, as nicotine does. And it’s not addictive, either. And it’s easy to embarrass someone wearing such perfume by muttering something about it loud enough for them to hear. Not so, however, with smokers.

There is currently a public “cultural” outcry against smoking by non-smokers for good reasons. Not the least of which are health related. If it takes pushing the empathy button or striking fear into the hearts of those too stubborn and/or addicted to nicotine to break the habit, then I say go for it.

Yes, it should be that anyone who wants to damage themselves by smoking should do it in the privacy of their own homes. That way they don’t wind up being role models for kids and they don’t befoul my air space any more than I already have to deal with.

And if the public pressure gets so bad that they quit, all the better for them. And their families. And the public.

We ban spitting on the sidewalk. And littering. Why not ban public smoking.

It’s bad enough that we’re on opposite ends of the country from each other. Now we’re on opposite ends of a very personal issue.

4 thoughts on “smoke gets in my eyes
and nose and sinuses…

  1. Well, i understand parts of this, but I have to admit — while the gov’t fails to do anything about regulating automobiles and factories, etc those things are doing FAR more damage than second hand smoke outside. Inside is another matter and I am glad they banned it inside. And if in PDX they banned it in places like bus stops (a semi-enclosed area) I think that’s fine, too.
    But while I’ve always hated in when I sat down in a park only to have a smoker sit upwind of me, I have the option of moving. Or if I like the spot I’m in so very much I can politely ask if they’d mind shifting downwind.
    I used to smoke. Don’t any longer, and don’t like having to explain to my four-year-old what our neighbor is doing and having him pretend his lollipop is a cigarette, I also can’t control the whole world. There’s no smoking allowed in my house. If I’m out and about and it’s there, I can move.
    I’m not really sure which side of this I ultimately come down on. But I do think the argument that second hand smoke from walking down the street past smokers, is more than a tad weak.
    Beyon that — nothing wrong with disagreeing with your son. It sure isn’t the first time. 😉

  2. I didn’t challenge the appropriateness of the issue. I challenged using irrelevant stories and pushing emotional buttons as a way to “discuss” the issue.
    Finding a guy dead from coughing up bits of his own lungs has not a single thing to do with discussing smoking on public sidewalks.
    Stoking the fires of emotional furor is the tactic of the sorts of politicians you dislike. But the tactic is okay when you happen support the cause in question?

  3. Noxiousness

    So, while WWire adds its own mention of Saltzman’s opposition to Leonard’s intention to ban smoking in public altogether, my Mother is engaging in some diversionary debate on the matter as well….

  4. Sunday on ice; Keillor on the radio

    I looked out the door this morning to see my car totally covered in ice and surrounded by driveway as slick as a skating rink. I was in Albany, having stayed overnight with one of my women friends. My five…

Leave a Reply