I took my digital camera into the not-yet-completed town park adjacent to my building this afternoon. I know that I’ll never take photos as good as Shelley’s but it was a perfect day to give it a few shots. Too bad I didn
Monthly Archives: May 2003
Emphasizing the questions.
In his No Utopia, Jim Culleny does his take on Paul Krugman’s piece on “Matter of Emphasis.”
A good place to start: look up “deceit” in the dictionary and you’ll find the picture of a right-wing Republican apologist in front of a backdrop of logos of major TV news corporations. Then look up “seducible” and you’ll find a group photo of 70% of the U.S. population. If we could only get it into our heads that once a government knows it can get away with creating lies to hype a “good” cause it’s only a matter of time before it cranks up its lie-making machine to hype any cause.
Owning to the tenor of the times and the effects of two great mishaps (the 2000 election and 9/11), in practical terms, whatever “is” was before the truth became a sound bite– will be a mystery wrapped in an enigma cloaked in a photo-op of the president getting tail-hooked onto an aircraft carrier wearing big goggles and a top-gun suit, then being greeted by a sea of cheering troops, and finally giving a speech about how the war is …sort-of… over. It was a moment made for TV, literally.
And this quote on No Utopia deserves repeating:
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the president,or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,but it is morally treasonable to the American public.”
— Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
And so does this:THE CONSTITUTION …have you ever read it?
Are you sure you’re not scared yet?
If you’re not sure, this sure should make it so — the following from an article by Joe Vecchio at the Democratic Underground: (Thanks to Steve James for the link.)
Free Inquiry magazine recently printed an article by political scientist Dr. Lawrence Britt, who studied the fascist regimes of Germany, Italy, Spain, Indonesia and Chile. In this article he points out fourteen “identifying characteristics” of fascism. They are:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the Military
Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5. Rampant Sexism
The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.
6. Controlled Mass Media
Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
7. Obsession with National Security
Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is Protected
The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed .
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
14. Fraudulent Elections
Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
Vecchio’s article includes lots of other very disturbing facts and some equally disturbing accurate observations, such as:
The “war” has since come and gone quickly, and the ones that perpetrated it are basking in the glow of victory, as a bunch of drunken, low-class thugs might celebrate kicking a homeless man to death. The river has long since caught fire, but instead of racing to put it out and trying to fix the problem so that it doesn’t happen again, we seem to be enjoying it. In fact, we’re sitting on the pier roasting weiners and singing songs. Do we worry that the fire is going to burn our own houses down sooner ot later? Nah, that’d never happen to us.
And meanwhile, just one more reason to be seriously concerned about just where Bush’s head is at.
Meet the Alaskan Crone.
Yes, that’s Crone, not crane. Check out Klondike Kate’s Aurora weblog, not only for magical photos of the Aurora Borealis, but for her wild but true stories of life on the edges of the ice. She’s smart and smart-mouthed and has lived long and hard enough to have some wisdom-stimulating experiences.
Another reason why I like Howard Dean.
This from his weblog via Betsy Devine:
…if you want to know what’s on heavy rotation here in Burlington, it’s undoubtedly the What I Want to Know (Dance Mix).
The Georgia Dean for America group (gaforhowarddean@yahoo.com) writes:
“You asked for it, so we created it
Are we all really, really, really worried yet?
I sure hope that we are, and that it means we
Getting There.
Getting there is supposed to be half the fun. You
The dilemma of discontinuity.
This weblog is, for me, a combination of personal journal and political broadside. The political part poses no problem; its exists in the moment.
But the personal journal is a largely spontaneous and certainly continuous story. Each personal reflection exists in a larger context. But weblog surfers and readers don
As further illumination on the demon thing.
This is a poem that sort of wrote itself after doing some intuitive work with my shamanic therapist — years, years ago, during my more (ahem) sexually active era. It’s based on one of my “vision quests” and was published in an anthology called Which Lilith: Feminist Writers Recreate the World’s First Woman, so it can’t be all that bad. I share it here to illustrate the benefits of dancing with my demons. Lilith is an archetype that loomed large in my therapeutic work, and if you’re at all interested in why, you can read Frank Paynter’s old interview with me.
Surrounded by Satyrs, Lilith Takes a Stand
Suddenly, they are all around me,
their jagged tracks
pointing in all directions,
etched into the earth like runes,
battered circles, omens of confusion.
They speak without words–
a slow lidding of eyes,
curving of mouth, writhing of tongue.
Their dappled shadows prance
to an overture of leaves
a crescendo of sun.
My body begins to dance in answer,
smell their musk
taste their salty steam,
sense thier strokes of fine hairs,
course skin, and
yes..yes..
Until the cloud, the cold–
a cold of mind,
an absence of heart.
I force myself to speak,
and the words break the spell,
their magic stronger
than even that basest call.
“And then what, my friends,
what then, when it is over,
and the night wind finds our skin,
urging us to a place safe for dreaming?
What then, when morning steals our union,
and you scamper away,
hungry for the day’s diversions–
impromptu symphonies of senses?
And worse still,
what if you stay,
and I am caught in your silent
single-minded worship
of a world without words?
I have been here before, my frirends,
have reached into that dark fire
blazing so far from the hearth–
that ancient seething
that (even now)
I breathe from you,
feed from you
send to my nightly cauldron
to simmer and stir,
to ladle, at last,
into mounds of midnight words,
this witch’s brew.”
In the failing light,
the satyrs shift
and snort their disaffections;
their shadows sink into stones
to high for holding
I leave the stones to claim
their wordless dreams.
This is not a competition.
Whoa! My post on Dancing with your demons got one of my Blog Sisters all worked up and it seems that I’ve given the wrong impression to about how I feel about using drugs to treat severe depression. My reference to “drugs” was to nnon-prescription ones that supposedly provide an “altered state of consciousness.” I certainly was not criticizing anyone taking prescription anti-depressives. Hell, I’m one of them. If you’re interested, you can read the wrong impressions posted here on the discussion on Blog Sisters, where I also comment, in my defense:
I was just suggesting an alternative to talk therapy, which seems not to be working for some webloggers whom I read. I never meant to discount the traditional ways to treat severe depression. I was simply sharing information for those who, like me, do see life as being all there is, so we sure ought to try to live it well and have some fun along the way.
Jealousof my new Blog Sisters’ youth and popularity? If I were, why would I give them links to send even more readers their way? This is not a competition going on here. This is a sharing of experiences and information.
My post was meant to be an explanation of why I like the inner adventures that shamanic therapy leads me into — the chance to step into my own personal mythos and get swept away into those deep caverns of my psyche that are not accessible any other way. For me, that’s the place where personal power simmers, the hearthfire around which those sweet demons linger, waiting to be revealed, loved, and released. It’s where poetry begins.
I’m sorry that I led so many of you to forget for a moment that, like you, I’m a complex individual, with varied interests and experiences — some of them seemingly contradictory. As Walt Whitman once wrote (or something similar) “Do I contradict myself? Very well, I contradict myself.” Don’t we all?
For me (see, I’m not even trying to link to anyone else here) life IS a journey of self-discovery. It always has been, even during the times when I felt most at sea, most discouraged. Some people turn to their god at those times. Not believing in anything like that, I turn to those deep places inside myself that, I know, have the guts and wisdom to figure things out. And the help I get doing that is from a therapist who employs more intuitive methods than rational thought. It’s not fanatical. It’s a method of therapy that works best for some of us, and it often works well for the more creative and adventuresome, which is what I see most webloggers as, so it’s why I tried to suggest it. Different strokes, right? This is not a competition.