That’s where my mom’s thoughts are these days — lost in Yonkers, which is where she lived most of her life and where I grew up. She’s spending most of her time going through old photos and organizing them. As she does this, she’s transported back in time, back to better times, back to the times when our extended family numbered in the many, many dozens. Now, the few that are left are even worse shape than she is in. She got a call yesterday that one of my aunts is in the hospital dying of cancer. Losing. Losing. Lost. This is my mom in the 1940s having her portrait painted by a woman-artist who escaped the Nazis and whose husband-doctor my dad helped to set up a practice in Yonkers back.
The portrait is no Vermeer, but I can probably write a better poem about it than I seem to be able to do with the assigned Lady Writing a Letter.
I guess I’m feeling pretty lost myself, although not in Yonkers. I’m feeling lost in my own skin, my own life. I can’t seem to generate whatever it is I need to work on my poetry. As a result, I’m not at my every-other-Tuesday-night group, and I won’t be going to the Grennon workshop on Thursday. Actually, I’m heading out to Boston on Friday to help my daughter and son-in-law look at some houses they might want to buy. Getting ready for that trip is a whole lot more important to me than sitting down and wrestling some more with Vermeer’s Lady. My brother is coming up to stay with my mom. And I’m packing up my car with food and diapers and more toys for my little grandson, and bags and bags of Peppridge Farm double chocolate Milano and Geneva cookes that I buy at the discount outlet store because we’re all addicted to them.
The poetry will come when it comes. I’m driving out of here to get lost in family.
And then I’ll come back and work on getting ready for the last of the Grennon workshop sessions. I don’t want to miss that last one, because it’s the last workshop I’m going to be doing for a long while to come. I’ll either write poetry or I won’t. But I will or won’t on my own terms.
Monthly Archives: April 2004
A Walk in the Park with Mom
It’s hardly a metaphorical “walk in the park,” but it was worth getting my mom into a wheelchair and taking her for a walk around our next-door park. Good exercise for me, actually.
Spring is not my favorite season — something to do with allergies, adjusting to warmer weather and all that comes with it. There’s a heaviness all around me — both in metaphor and reality.
I’d love to be able to “spring clean” my life; I’m hoping I can get enough energy up to throw out those old “corporate” clothes that are left over from my old life. I live in jeans and t-shirts and expect to continue to do so.
Mom walked in. Gotta go.
Like a Labyrinth
Sometimes life, like a labyrinth I wrote almost a year ago.
I think that I applied to the Grennon poetry workshop to see if I’m good enough to get in. I got in. Now I’m struggling to keep up. Not that I’m not good enough; rather my attentions are elsewhere. I’m a caregiver. I’m remembering today an art exhibit I went to back in September of 2000, when my life was my own and caregiving was absolutely not an option I would consider.
The exhibitor was Gail Nadeau, and her works were photographic enlargements of collages that she and her (dying from Alzheimer’s) mother had put together during the mother’s final days. It was called “From Artist to Caregiver: Holding the Edges Together.”
This is one of their collages, which I scanned from a postcard reproduction that I picked up at the exhibit. I was drawn to it because it’s called “Saffron’s Garden,” and the cat in it is a replica of my first cat, whose name was Saffron — you know, like in Mellow Yellow.
I made a point of talking to the artist, who was there at the opening reception. She talked of how she had given up three years of her life to help her mother through the most difficult time of both their lives. It seemed to me that she didn’t give up much as an artist, because what she did was immerse herself in an experience that she transformed into the most moving and awe-some art.
Now, in one sense, that’s a selfish way to look at it. In another, it’s a way to remind myself that life is what you make it.
I was the only one in Grennon’s workshop who didn’t really do the assignment as assigned. The good part was that, in my private session with him, he helped me begin revising the poem I’ve been having trouble with. It’s now transforming itself into three related poems. More on that another time.
The other good news is that, on my way into the building, I noticed a flyer announcing a presentation/book signing by John Horgan, science writer and author of Rational Mysticism. Now, that’s a title that catches my interest. He will be on campus on Monday, May 3. Maybe I can make it.
In the meanwhile, I go and get the book from the library. A blurb on the back cover says “A thought-provoking pilgrimage to the growing interface of science and spirituality…” I start reading the book and am hooked. It’s not that he gives any answers. There are no answers. What he does is remind me that it’s the transformative power of the journey that’s the point. Awesomeness emerges from going deep and being open to the experience of the moment.
Last night I watched an episode of “Without a Trace,” that I had taped in which one of the characters finds out his father (with whom he has the same kind of relationship that I often have with my mom) is slipping into Alzheimer’s.
There seem to be messages here for me in all of this. The messages I often and otherwise get from the world around me translate into something that seem to say ” be more selfish…put your mother aside and live your life…”
I remind myself of Nadeau’s choice and the results. I absorb Hogan’s reflections on what is truly “awe-some” about life.
My labyrinth. My path. My journey. My choice. Who knows that marvels might result?
UPDATE: Hah! So I go for a walk in the beautiful park next to my building and notice that there are a bunch of guys putting in dozens and dozens of 6 foot high spruce in some kind of pattern. “That’s a lot of trees. What’s that going to be?” I ask. “A maze,” he says, “146 trees and a quiet place to sit in the middle.” Now, a maze is a configuration meant to confuse; you can get lost in a maze. I doubt if they’d put a maze in a park where there are lots of little kids running around. But a labyrinth?? I’ll be it’s a labyrinth — which leads to a center, and in and out of which there is only one way. How about that for meaningful coincidence?
The Language Game
Michael Moore rides again in this post, which reminds me how my cousin’s tour of duty has been extended in Iraq so that the war profiteers don’t have to take any risks.
First, can we stop the Orwellian language and start using the proper names for things? Those are not
Fudging the assignment.
This is what I’m taking into my workshop session tomorrow. I was supposed to revise what was selected (out of three I had written) as the first stanza of a poem about Vermeer’s painting and then write three possible second stanzas. I gave it my best shot, but that didn’t work for me. What works for me is this:
Vermeer
You definitely can’t push a rope.
I’m getting nowhere with revising and creating the poetry for the workshop session on Thursday. My muse is not even a rope; she’s a thread — a worn thread raveling from the edge of my sleeve of care.
Instead, I
— take my mom out to find a quad-cane that works for her; none of them is the one
— start trying to root two avocado pits
— touch up my hair color, which takes some time because I mix two different colors (it’s that tinkering thing again)
— eat some chocolate
— order a nose aspirator and cheap stethescope for my grandson.
— check my weblog comments
— read my son’s weblog
— read my email and follow a link to here
— finish the fabric book I’m making for my grandson
— cook up a batch of chicken marsala and freeze some for my next Boston trip
— leave the new batch of dishes in the sink for later
— pet my cat
— blog
— ponder some more the woman in the Vermeer painting and come up with this:
She wonders what lie to tell him this time.
A husband returned from trade too soon?
A fretful child awake all night with fevered dreams?
What she can
Small question. Big answer.
The dishes are done. The cat litter emptied. Mother has been given her food and her pills. And all the while I’m pondering how I would answer this question that I have asked myself: “Why do you want to write poetry??”
And this is what I have come to realize:
I don’t WANT to write poetry. What I want is, when I feel COMPELLED (read “inspired”) to write a poem, to know how to make it a really good poem , to energize it with the power of language, technique, form.
That’s why I’m in this workshop.
Poet at Work. Blogger at Process.
Burden or Bliss?
Last night, I spent three hours in front of my computer screen, wrestling with that damned #3.
In a time of previous struggle, a friend of mine reminded me that “you can’t push a rope.” My muse is as limp as a rope.
It’s Easter Sunday. It’s Spring. When does bliss become burden?
I resurrect an old poem.
Waiting for the Fall
I was never one to yearn for spring,
the sky too full of eager wings,
the air a burden of song.
Even the ground swells, straining
under a yoke of seeds.
I wake with the winds of autumn,
when a cold sun
fades the trees to clarity,
when the line of the sky
cuts clean and sharp
above the leveled land,
when the earth is a slate
set for the poet
The Process of Poetry
This is going to be a long post. If you’re not interested in how a poem gets written, revised, rewritten and “de-scaffolded”, you probably should move on.
I’m struggling to complete an assignment that we in Eamon Grennon’s advanced poetry workshop were given to complete by this Thursday. And I do mean struggling. It’s our second assignment.
Our first assignment was to write three possible first stanzas based on this Vermeer painting. Each stanza had to be 11 lines long, and each line had to have between 9 and thirteen syllables. At the first workshop meeting, each of us 12 “advanced poets” read his/her three versions, and the group, including Grennon, reached a decision about which version was the “best.” Interestingly enough, we all tended to agree.
These are the three I wrote: (Notice that the first version was just something I had to get out of my personal system; the second was based on my doing a little historical research about the era in which the painting was executed; the third was my stretch to come up with a novel angle on the scene.)
#1
You can be sure that picking up a pen,
already dripping virulent ink,
will bring an old woman rapping at the door
armed with a burned pot and dented memory;
or maybe a mad cat clawing at the sleeve
of the rich wrap you threw on against
the chill of an exigent morning held at bay.
You yearn for moments between dawn and day,
for the silence sought by a rhymed mind.
You hunt the lines that pulled your smile from sleep,
and learn to expect interruptions.
#2
How she resents the power of such darkness
When we kill our own…
You can’t have a war without people getting killed. You kill them. They kill you. But in this modern era of smart bombs that are really not that smart at all, we too often wind up killing our own.
My friend and former therapist, Ed Tick, has a letter to the editor in today’s paper that begins:
David Morris’ March 26 commentary on fratricide summarizes several incidents in both the first and present Iraq wars in which American and coalition ground troops were killed by our own A-10 attack jets. These American deaths due to friendly fire underscore an ignored but persistent problem of modern war.
I have worked with a grunt who was the only survivor when our own forces dropped a bomb on his sleeping squad, a spotter pilot almost shot down by our side, a Gulf War veteran trapped in a firefight in which both the enemy and our own forces tried to destroy him because his tiny position was in the way of their big fight. The pain, outrage and sense of betrayal caused by incidents like these do not disappear over time. These are but a few recent examples from local veterans of a much larger problem endemic to modern warfare.
Ed now works primarily with Veterans who have Post Traumatic Stress. The stories he tells about what this country’s whoring [sic] has put our military men and women through are enough to turn anyone but the most war-mongering into pacifists.
I have never understood why we just don’t send those who want war INTO the war to do the actual fighting. You want it? You should bear the brunt of it.